Provide a detailed description of design considerations and future plans
This commit is contained in:
parent
2e02a056cc
commit
d02fc5f386
1 changed files with 75 additions and 0 deletions
75
README.md
75
README.md
|
|
@ -21,8 +21,14 @@ Args:
|
||||||
-V, --version Print version
|
-V, --version Print version
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We also provide a manpage, which targets OpenBSD-level quality. Incorrect or
|
||||||
|
outdated information is a bug.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Testing
|
## Testing
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For testing, there is a shell script "test.sh" included. It sets up a block dev
|
||||||
|
and writes (and verifies) a bunch of nonsense to it. It boils down to:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
dd if=/dev/zero of=./disk.img bs=1M count=1024
|
dd if=/dev/zero of=./disk.img bs=1M count=1024
|
||||||
losetup -fP ./disk.img
|
losetup -fP ./disk.img
|
||||||
|
|
@ -30,6 +36,75 @@ losetup -a
|
||||||
losedup -d /dev/loop0
|
losedup -d /dev/loop0
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Writes to a regular files is not currently in scope, although it would simplify
|
||||||
|
testing.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Design Considerations
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Most of the sanity checking is currently highly Linux specific. We should
|
||||||
|
prefer general/posix solutions that reach **at least** FreeBSD, preferably
|
||||||
|
OpenBSD and Solaris as well. FreeBSD did implement procfs, but its a Linux-ism
|
||||||
|
and it has since been deprecated. I would prefer not to turn this rather simple
|
||||||
|
code into macro-mozaic, as i've seen other similar projects do. After all, this
|
||||||
|
is just a juiced-up dd-rewrite at its core.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Apple products are unsupported.** Im simply not interested in ensuring
|
||||||
|
compatibility with a walled-garden ecosystem. If *you* are, we can change that.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
At the time of writing, my FreeBSD server is down for maintenance, which means
|
||||||
|
all of my development and testing is focused on AMD64, AArch64 and AArch32
|
||||||
|
Linux.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In the setup phase of the program, we can absolutely afford to do lots of
|
||||||
|
sanity checking via syscalls. Between each block write, we flush the disk
|
||||||
|
buffers. These flushes are larger (1 MiB when buffer is full) than the sector
|
||||||
|
size (often 4k or 64k) of the flash, so as far as i know, this is a gentle way
|
||||||
|
to write flash, and should not incur any significant performance overhead. 1
|
||||||
|
MiB is also a multiple of the most common sector sizes. We could write it all
|
||||||
|
with no flushing, but that would mean the progress indicator will measure
|
||||||
|
buffered writes, which is useless.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
It should be possible to induce optimal block size, but this ide has not been
|
||||||
|
explored yet.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Currently when verifying the written data, we read from both the input file and
|
||||||
|
the output block device and do a byte-by-byte comparison. A CRC32 is also
|
||||||
|
calculated in the first pass of the input file read. In the second pass (the
|
||||||
|
verification stage), we calculate the CRC32 of the block device data and
|
||||||
|
compare that to our previous result. **This means that we currently use two
|
||||||
|
separate methods of verification**. The program allocates **two** separate
|
||||||
|
buffers in the startup phase for comparisons. This will change in the coming
|
||||||
|
releases, and we will rely only on the CRC.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
De-allocation is handled in the interrupt vector as well as in the 'sad-paths',
|
||||||
|
but ultimately this program can be regarded as samurai-principled. We try to
|
||||||
|
handle deallocation, but exit on failure and let the kernel handle the rest.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The use of a crypto-grade checksumming algorithm was considered, but was
|
||||||
|
ultimately rejected in favour of a lookup based CRC32. Its simpler, faster and
|
||||||
|
easier to understand (See: [crc32.h](./crc32.h)). We may include a compile-time
|
||||||
|
option to disable the lookup table to reduce size for really small targets, but
|
||||||
|
we speculate that those targets are already satisfied with busybox-dd.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We also considered using libudev or any of its analogues, to determine the type
|
||||||
|
of block device (spinning or flash), but my somewhat inconclusive research
|
||||||
|
indicates that it does not include functionality to determine the medium type
|
||||||
|
(usb/sd/sata), which is ultimately what i would like to warn the user about.
|
||||||
|
The libudev library is also Linux specific.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We also need completion scripts for the most common shells. This includes csh,
|
||||||
|
bash and zsh. Should be easy enough when we set our minds to it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
See:
|
||||||
|
- `grep -nE 'BLK[A-Za-z0-9]+' /usr/include/linux/fs.h`
|
||||||
|
In particular, we're interested in BLKGETSIZE64 and BLKFLSBUF for now.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We can read the device info from:
|
||||||
|
- /sys/class/block/[name]/*
|
||||||
|
Like:
|
||||||
|
- /sys/class/block/[name]/device/model
|
||||||
|
- /sys/class/block/[name]/size
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Inspiration
|
## Inspiration
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
See:
|
See:
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue